Authors
John Zeis
Canisius College
Abstract
Catholic moral philosophy requires an absolute prohibition against the direct killing of innocents. In this paper I consider some examples of justified actionswhich involve the killing of innocent persons and will present them as cases about which I am confident many others will share the same intuitions. I willthen try to show what conditions apply in such cases that justify those intuitions. I will argue that their justification is in accordance with a modified version of theFinnis, Grisez, Boyle interpretation of the doctrine of double effect; it defends their interpretation of what is direct versus indirect in cases of double effect, and meets the proportionality condition in a way suggested by Philippa Foot regarding the virtues of justice and charity.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Conference Proceedings  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0065-7638
DOI acpaproc20047824
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Danger of Double Effect.P. A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect.John Zeis - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
Terrorism, Secularism, and the Deaths of Innocents. Reeder - 2011 - Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 21 (2):70-94.
Deconstructing the Doctrine of Double Effect.Richard Hull - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (2):195-207.
Response to Anderson.John Zeis - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):619-624.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.
Trolleys and Double Effect in Experimental Ethics.Ezio Di Nucci - forthcoming - In Christoph Luetge, Hannes Rusch & Matthias Uhl (eds.), Experimental Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Four Versions of Double Effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Intentions, Motives and the Doctrine of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
Terrorism, Supreme Emergency and Killing the Innocent.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2009 - Perspectives - The Review of International Affairs 17 (1):105-126.
The Danger of Double Effect.P. A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
4 ( #1,184,903 of 2,349,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes