David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):619-624 (2010)
In a recent article in this journal, Robert Anderson criticizes my position in the Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 2004, whereinI argued for the justification of certain kinds of actions even though they involve the killing of innocents. He does not adequately assess the salient features of thekinds of cases I was defending, and he ignores my use of Philippa Foot’s distinction between the demands of justice and charity in characterizing the morally relevant principles involved in such cases. I argued that the actions involving the killing of the innocent as a side effect in such cases is not the kind of killing which justice prohibits because in such cases there is both no one who is killed unjustly and yet there are lives which charity clearly demands that we save. In this paper, I respond to Anderson’s criticism of my 2004 paper
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Zeis (2004). Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
Carson Strong (1981). Positive Killing and the Irreversibly Unconscious Patient. Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3-4):190-205.
Joachim Asscher (2008). The Moral Distinction Between Killing and Letting Die in Medical Cases. Bioethics 22 (5):278–285.
Jeff McMahan (2005). The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing. Philosophical Issues 15 (1):386–405.
Helen Frowe (2013). Killing John to Save Mary: A Defence of the Distinction Between Killing and Letting Die. In J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke & H. Silverstein (eds.), Action, Ethics and Responsibility. MIT Press.
Alan Thomas (2012). Giving Each Person Her Due: Taurek Cases and Non-Comparative Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):661-676.
E. Bruce Flory & Anna May Anderson (1976). Ernest Paul Anderson 1947-1976. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50 (2):135 -.
Gabriel Palmer-Fernández (2000). Innocence in War. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):161-174.
Peter Vallentyne (2002). Libertarianism, Self-Ownership and Consensual Killing. Revue Philosophique De Louvain.
Christopher J. Eberle (2013). Comments on Carnahan, Anderson, and Wolterstorff. Philosophia 41 (2):437-445.
Uwe Steinhoff (2006). Torture - the Case for Dirty Harry and Against Alan Dershowitz. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (3):337-353.
Charles Taliaferro (2007). Transcendence and Feminism: Response to Anderson's “Feminist Challenges to Conceptions of God”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):371-373.
Helen Frowe (2008). Equating Innocent Threats and Bystanders. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):277-290.
A. J. Baker (1986). Australian Realism: The Systematic Philosophy of John Anderson. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #533,022 of 1,924,716 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #417,761 of 1,924,716 )
How can I increase my downloads?