The stimulus in the intermediate size problem

Psychological Review 73 (3):257-261 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0023213

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Adults and the intermediate size problem.Michael D. Zeiler & Jo Lang - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):312.
The basis of solution by chimpanzees of the intermediate size problem.K. W. Spence - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (4):257.
New dimensions of the intermediate size problem: Neither absolute nor relational response.Michael D. Zeiler - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (6):588.
Intermediate size discrimination in seven- and eight-year-old children.Michael D. Zeiler & Ann M. Gardner - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):203.
The ratio theory of intermediate size discrimination.Michael D. Zeiler - 1963 - Psychological Review 70 (6):516-533.
Solution of the two-stimulus transposition problem by four- and five-year-old children.Michael D. Zeiler - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):576.
Effect of size on visual slant.Robert B. Freeman Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):96.
Stimulus probability and stimulus set size in memory scanning.Irving Biederman & E. Webb Stacy - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1100.
The interaction of association value and stimulus configuration in size estimation.Margaret E. Dow & Jesse E. Gordon - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (5):332.
Effect of test stimulus range on stimulus generalization in human subjects.Gary Hansen, Arthur Tomie, David R. Thomas & Doris H. Thomas - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):634.
Size of stimulus in relation to the eye's sensitivity to light and to the amount and rate of dark adaptation.C. E. Ferree, G. Rand & M. R. Stoll - 1934 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 17 (5):646.
The relation of size of stimulus and intensity in the human eye: II. Intensity thresholds for red and violet light.C. H. Graham & N. R. Bartlett - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (6):574.
Stimulus generalization as a function of contextual stimuli.Harry Helson & Lloyd L. Avant - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):565.
Stimulus and response frequency and sequential effects in memory scanning reaction times.John Theios & Dennis G. Walter - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1092.
Relative size in isolation as a stimulus for relative perceived distance.William Epstein & Stephen S. Baratz - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):507.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
3 (#1,690,426)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references