Overlapping Consensus

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):101-115 (2009)
Abstract
Rawls’ idea of overlapping consensus is crucial for the public justification of a political conception of justice in modern democratic societies. While overlapping consensus is mostly understood empirically, in the first part of this article we argue that a normative interpretation is more appropriate. Moreover, we try to show that Baccarini’s proposal of qualified consensus, in contrast to an assumed empirical reading, actually exploits the potentials of a normative reading. In the second part, we concern ourselves with the epistemological implications of a normative understanding of overlapping consensus or, more precisely, with the issue of epistemic deontologism. If we claim that consensus should be understood as agreement about not already existing beliefs and reasons, but about beliefs and reasons that citizens should acquire, it can be argued that this implies a thesis about voluntary control over beliefs. We try to show that a normative reading can be compatible with strategies based both on doxastic voluntarism and doxastic involuntarism
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1333-1108
DOI croatjphil2009918
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,215
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
“Overlapping Consensus” on “Overlapping Consensus”.Tong Shijun - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (Supplement):29-45.
Can Classical Utilitarianism Participate in Overlapping Consensus? Why Not?Hun Chung - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:53-60.
The Non-Modularity of Moral Knowledge.Theresa Waynand Tobin - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:33-50.
Overlapping Consensus.Remi Odedoyin - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:323-343.
The Epistemic Significance of Consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry 46 (4):501 – 521.
Is a Political Conception of “Overlapping Consensus” an Adequate Basis for Global Justice?Karl-Otto Apel - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:1-15.
Possibilities of Consensus: Toward Democratic Moral Discourse.Bruce Jennings - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):447-463.
Consensus and Normative Validity.Harald Grimen - 1997 - Inquiry 40 (1):47 – 61.
Environmental Values, Pluralism, and Stability.Ted Preston - 2004 - Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1 & 2):73 – 83.
Consensus in Science.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:193-204.
Political Liberalism and Citizenship Education: Towards Curriculum Reform.John Halliday - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (1):43 - 55.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

18 ( #269,295 of 2,164,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums