Argumentation 12 (1):57-77 (1998)
In this paper, I demonstrate how the Passover Haggadah exploits certain features of conversational interaction in both the production formats of its texts and in its performance formats (or ways it indicates it should be performed) during the Passover Seder. Some conversational methods used include the use of dispreferred second pair parts which creates an impression that at least part of the Haggadah's text resembles a kind of conversational argument. Furthermore, as a recitable text, the Haggadah exploits the use of and changes in footings in a manner reminiscent of how reported speech is used in ordinary conversation to introduce participant roles and virtual participants with their own commitments, orientations and positions which may not represent those of the animators of the recited text. While the Haggadah is not an actual argument in conventional terms, it is a script of ritual texts organized according to a logic similar to the one by which certain kinds of conversational arguments are organized. Participants are able to animate participatory roles and assess the positions, orientations and commitments such roles represent in a manner that rehearses how such positions, orientations and commitments might be accomplished in actual argumentation
|Keywords||Haggadah Jewish ritual footing sequential organizational conversational argumentation recitative reconstruction preference|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Criticism and Conversational Texts: Rhetorical Bases of Role, Audience, and Style in the Buber-Rogers Dialogue. [REVIEW]Rob Anderson & Kenneth N. Cissna - 1996 - Human Studies 19 (1):85 - 118.
Designing Conversational Agents: Effect of Conversational Form on Our Comprehension. [REVIEW]Koji Yamashita, Hidekazu Kubota & Toyoaki Nishida - 2005 - AI and Society 20 (2):125-137.
Semantically Cued Contextual Implicatures in Legal Texts.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2010 - Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3):728-743.
Rationality and Conversation: A Thesis on Grice's Theory of Conversation.Matthew D. Schoolfield - unknown
Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. [REVIEW]M. Azar - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):97-114.
Innovative Techniques for Legal Text Retrieval.Marie-Francine Moens - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):29-57.
Medical Hermeneutics: Where is the “Text” We Are Interpreting?Richard J. Baron - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (1).
Historical Origins of Argumentum Ad Consequentiam.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):251-264.
Post-Structural Readings of a Logico-Mathematical Text.Roy Wagner - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (2):pp. 196-230.
Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory.Nancy Green - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):181-196.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads35 ( #146,965 of 2,169,769 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,217 of 2,169,769 )
How can I increase my downloads?