The unbearable lightness of representing 'reality' in science education: A response to Schulz

Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (4):494-514 (2008)
Abstract
This article responds to Schulz's criticisms of an earlier paper published in Educational Philosophy and Theory. The purpose in this paper is to clarify and extend some of my earlier arguments, to indicate what is unfortunate (i.e. what is lost) from a non-charitable, modernist reading of Lyotardian postmodernism (despite its weaknesses), and to suggest what new directions are emerging in science education from efforts to move beyond an either/or dichotomy of foundationalism and relativism.
Keywords postmodernism  science education  Lyotard
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00360.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Pandora’s Hope.Bruno Latour - 1999 - Harvard University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
21 ( #321,962 of 2,313,601 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #96,021 of 2,313,601 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature