Evidence both for and against metacognition is insufficient

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):357-358 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors' attempt to explore the ability of animals to monitor how certain they are of their choice behavior, necessarily fails both in their effort to include “higher” mammals (such as monkeys and dolphins) in the class of metacognitive organisms (humans) and in their conclusion that “lower” organisms are not capable of similar behavior.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#431,398)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Can Rats Reason?Savanah Stephane - 2015 - Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 2 (4):404-429.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references