Psychological Reports (forthcoming)

Authors
Frank Zenker
Bogazici University
Abstract
Although legal contexts are subject to biased reasoning and decision making, to identify and test debiasing techniques has largely remained an open task. We report on experimentally deploying the technique “giving reasons pro et contra” with professional and lay judges at Swedish municipal courts. Using a mock legal scenario, participants assessed the relevance of an eyewitness’s previous conviction for his credibility. On average, both groups displayed low degrees of bias. We observed a small positive debiasing effect only for professional judges. Strong evidence was obtained for a relation between profession and relevance-assessment: Lay judges seemed to assign a greater importance to the prior conviction than professional judges did. We discuss challenges for future research, calling other research groups to contribute additional samples.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1177/0033294117729807
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Adjudication and the Law.Timothy Endicott - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2):311-326.
Raz on the Internal Point of View.Mark McBride - 2011 - Legal Theory 17 (3):67-73.
Understanding and Evaluating Expert Testimony in the Law.David Joshua Strauss - 2004 - Dissertation, University of California, Riverside
Legal Audiences.Fábio Perin Shecaira & Noel Struchiner - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (2):273-291.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-27

Total views
13 ( #743,890 of 2,448,591 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #97,978 of 2,448,591 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes