Galilaeana 1 (XVI):41-75 (2019)

Joseph Zepeda
Thomas Aquinas College
This paper proposes a reading of Galileo’s Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina as analogous to a legal brief submitted to a court en banc. The Letter develops a theory of the general issues underlying the case at hand, but it is organized around advocacy for a particular judgment. I have drawn two architectonic implications from this framework, each of which helps to resolve an issue still standing in the literature. First, the Letter anticipates varying degrees of acquiescence to its general account, and provides ‘hooks’ for different readers to interpret variously while still converging on the particular judgment. This reading allows for a coherent Galilean interpretation of passages that notoriously concede priority to Scripture, while also explaining their dialectical function. Galileo is neither self-contradictory nor dissimulating here, but strategically leaves the specification of key distinctions for the reader. Second, the Letter, and particularly its apparent shifting of the burden of proof, must be understood in light of the tripartite ‘adversarial-judicial’ framework that Galileo sets up. The burden of proof is shifted to anti-Copernicans within the Church, not as a rhetorical trick, but because of the benefits of adversarial procedure that will accrue to the Church as the responsible judge.
Keywords Galileo’s trial, Science and the Catholic Church, Scriptural hermeneutics, Rhetoric of Science.
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Could There Be Another Galileo Case?Gregory W. Dawes - 2002 - Journal of Religion and Society 4.
Galileo's Theological Venture.Ernan McMullin - 2013 - Zygon 48 (1):192-220.
Experiences and the Bible in Galileo’s Letter to Castelli.Matjaž Vesel - 2015 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 37 (2):123-158.
The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (JR Milton).P. Machamer - 2000 - Philosophical Books 41 (1):29-30.
Galileo, Science, and the Church.Ali Haqi & Somayyeh Khazāyi - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 9 (36):195-230.
The Cambridge Companion to Galileo.Peter Machamer (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Galileo's 1604 Fragment on Falling Bodies.Stillman Drake - 1969 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (4):340-358.
Galileo as a 'Bad Theologian': A Formative Myth About Galileo's Trial.A. M. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):753-791.


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #594,699 of 2,462,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #45,620 of 2,462,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes