Making sense of the ‘is’ of constitution

Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 361 (1) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider a problem that arises in connection with cases of coincident objects and that affects the two main accounts that have been given of such cases, namely, Pluralism and Monism. The problem is that both views seem committed to accepting strained interpretations of some of the statements used to describe the situation. I consider Pickel’s arguments against the Pluralist’s strategy of interpreting ‘is’ as expressing constitution in sentences such as ‘The statue is the lump of clay’, and provide reasons for rejecting them—so as to vindicate, eventually, the Pluralist position.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contrast and Constitution.Peter van Elswyk - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (270):158-174.
What is the Grounding Problem?Louis deRosset - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):173-197.
Constitution and Identity.John Biro - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (6):1127-1138.
There is No 'Is' of Constitution.Bryan Pickel - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (2):193 - 211.
Constitution and the Necessity of Identity.Robert Francescotti - 2005 - Logique Et Analyse 48 (192):311-321.
I Am Not Your (Founding) Father.Mikołaj Barczentewicz - forthcoming - In Richard Albert, Nishchal Basnyat & Menaka Guruswamy (eds.), Founding Moments in Constitutionalism. Hart Publishing.
Material Constitution is Ad Hoc.Jeroen Smid - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (2):305-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-22

Downloads
5 (#1,160,928)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
On Referring.Peter F. Strawson - 1950 - Mind 59 (235):320-344.

View all 27 references / Add more references