A statistical learning approach to a problem of induction

Abstract

At its strongest, Hume's problem of induction denies the existence of any well justified assumptionless inductive inference rule. At the weakest, it challenges our ability to articulate and apply good inductive inference rules. This paper examines an analysis that is closer to the latter camp. It reviews one answer to this problem drawn from the VC theorem in statistical learning theory and argues for its inadequacy. In particular, I show that it cannot be computed, in general, whether we are in a situation where the VC theorem can be applied for the purpose we want it to.

Similar books and articles

Proving Induction.Alexander Paseau - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Logic 10:1-17.
Induction by Direct Inference Meets the Goodman Problem.Paul D. Thorn - 2018 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):1-24.
A material theory of induction.John D. Norton - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
Logically reliable inductive inference.Oliver Schulte - 2007 - In Michele Friend, Norma B. Goethe & Valentina Harizanov (eds.), Induction, algorithmic learning theory, and philosophy. Springer. pp. 157-178.
There Are No Universal Rules for Induction.John D. Norton - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):765-777.
Induction, grue emeralds and lady Macbeth's fallacy.Arthur Rubinstein - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (190):37-49.
Statistical Machine Learning and the Logic of Scientific Discovery.Antonino Freno - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (2):375-388.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-09

Downloads
141 (#90,551)

6 months
26 (#46,204)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kino Zhao
Simon Fraser University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Logic of Reliable Inquiry.Kevin T. Kelly - 1996 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press USA.
The Logic of Reliable Inquiry.Kevin Kelly - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):351-354.

Add more references