CSR-Based Political Legitimacy Strategy: Managing the State by Doing Good in China and Russia [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 111 (4):439-460 (2012)

The state is a key driver of corporate social responsibility across developed and developing countries. But the existing research provides comparatively little knowledge about: (1) how companies strategically manage the relationship with the state through corporate social responsibility (CSR); (2) how this strategy takes shape under the influence of political institutions. Understanding these questions captures a realistic picture of how a company applies CSR to interacting with the state, particularly in countries where the state relationship is critical to the business operation. This article draws on political legitimacy as a useful concept to directly address both strategic and politically embedded natures of CSR. This work extends the currently under-specified political implication of the strategic view of CSR and provides fresh insights to the political legitimacy research by specifying a typology of CSR-based legitimacy strategies and its contextual variation. China and Russia are the focal settings. A qualitative analysis of business—state interaction cases is done using a database that contains the majority of CSR reports published in Chinese and Russian as the end of 2009. As a result, this paper identifies four qualitatively different types of CSR-based political legitimacy strategies and reveals how the adoption of these strategies differs across Chinese companies, Russian companies, and multinational corporations
Keywords Business–state interaction  China  Corporate social responsibility  Multinational corporation  Political embeddedness  Political legitimacy  Russia
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1209-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,938
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility.Michael L. Barnett - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia: Peculiarities and Problems.Irina Soboleva - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:269-282.
Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia.Irina Soboleva - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:269-282.
Harmonious Society and Chinese Csr: Is There Really a Link?Geoffrey See - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):1 - 22.
CSR in China Research: Salience, Focus and Nature. [REVIEW]Jeremy Moon & Xi Shen - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4):613 - 629.
On the Value of Political Legitimacy.M. Coakley - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (4):345-369.
Social and Business Strategies.Daniela Toro & Joan Mundet - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:260-265.
The Challenge of Developing a Business Ethics in China.Po Keung Ip - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S1):211 - 224.


Added to PP index

Total views
72 ( #111,307 of 2,259,414 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #213,546 of 2,259,414 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature