Guilt Without Perceived Wrongdoing

Philosophy and Public Affairs 48 (3):285-314 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


According to the received account of guilt in the philosophical literature, one cannot feel guilt unless one takes oneself to have done something morally wrong. But ordinary people feel guilt in many cases in which they do not take themselves to have done anything morally wrong. In this paper, I focus on one kind of guilt without perceived wrongdoing, guilt about being merely causally responsible for a bad state-of-affairs. I go on to present a novel account of guilt that explains guilt about mere causal responsibility, according to which guilt represents part of the self as bound up with what is bad.

Similar books and articles

XIV. Don't Worry, Feel Guilty.J. David Velleman - 2003 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 52:235-248.
The Atonement and the Problem of Shame.Eleonore Stump - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Research 41 (9999):111-129.
Guit, Anger, and Retribution.Raffaele Rodogno - 2010 - Legal Theory 16 (1):59-76.
Collective guilt feeling revisited.Anita Konzelmann Ziv - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (3):467–493.
La culpabilité. [REVIEW]D. G. R. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):149-149.


Added to PP

411 (#30,391)

6 months
109 (#11,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Zhao
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Guilty Confessions.Hannah Tierney - 2021 - In Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 182-204.
On Penance.Justin A. Capes - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references