Open Philosophy 2 (1):39-48 (2019)

Authors
Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University
Joseph Ramsey
Carnegie Mellon University
Kun Zhang
Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
A central theme in western philosophy was to find formal methods that can reliably discover empirical relationships and their explanations from data assembled from experience. As a philosophical project, that ambition was abandoned in the 20th century and generally dismissed as impossible. It was replaced in philosophy by neo-Kantian efforts at reconstruction and justification, and in professional statistics by the more limited ambition to estimate a small number of parameters in pre-specified hypotheses. The influx of “big data” from climate science, neuropsychology, biology, astronomy and elsewhere implicitly called for a revival of the grander philosophical ambition. Search algorithms are meeting that call, but they pose a problem: how are their accuracies to be assessed in domains where experimentation is limited or impossible? Increasingly, the answer is through simulation of data from models of the kind of process in the domain. In some cases, these innovations require rethinking how the accuracy and informativeness of inference methods can be assessed. Focusing on causal inference, we give an example from neuroscience, but to show that the model/simulation strategy is not confined to causal inference, we also consider two classification problems from astrophysics: identifying exoplanets and identifying dark matter concentrations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/opphil-2019-0005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,704
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics.John Rawls - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (2):177-197.
On Small Differences in Sensation.C. S. Peirce & Joseph Jastrow - 1884 - Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 3:75-83.
The aim of inductive logic.Rudolf Carnap - 1996 - In Sahotra Sarkar (ed.), Journal of Symbolic Logic. Garland Pub. Co.. pp. 3--259.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Computer Simulation and the Features of Novel Empirical Data.Greg Lusk - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:145-152.
On the Theoretical Limits to Reliable Causal Inference.Benoit Desjardins - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Comorbid Science?David Danks, Stephen Fancsali, Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):153 - 155.
Data Models and the Acquisition and Manipulation of Data.Todd Harris - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-02

Total views
32 ( #305,711 of 2,340,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,750 of 2,340,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes