What do players do in a game? A Habermasian perspective

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 50 (3):311-328 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By adopting Habermas’ communicative theory, this paper categorizes players’ actions into four elements. The strategic action involves players manipulating each other within the framework of a gameFootnote1; normative action is manifested in following the rules and the underlying ethos; dramaturgical action emerges through the players’ deliberate presentation of themselves to both participants and spectators; and communicative action reveals the purpose of a game as a way of being. The conceptualization of game actions leads to a qualitative redefinition of the perfect game, which enables a greater understanding of the game, its participants, and human excellence. As such, this paper’s significance lies in the proposal that the Habermasian perfect game is a potential solution to Suits’ puzzle about what type of games can be played in his Utopia.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-17

Downloads
24 (#914,270)

6 months
8 (#597,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrew Edgar
Cardiff University
Emily Ryall
University of Gloucestershire

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations