Comparison between Hegel’s Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching’s Yin-Yang-I (Change)


Authors
Abstract
This article introduces a cross-cultural comparative study on Hegel’s Western triad of Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching (including Tao-Teh-Ching, TTK)’s Eastern triad of Yin-Yang-I (Change). The study exposes the similarities and differences between the two triads in three aspects: concept, internal motivation, and external manifestation. Results include: (1) Hegel’s “Tao” is not identical to that of the Yin-Yang paradigm; (2) Hegel’s envision of Becoming is intrinsically far away from the essence of I-Ching’s I.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Buddhist Consciousnesses and Psychological Forces.Ma Zhen - 2016 - Asian Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 1 (5):1-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Theory of Human Nature in the Philosophy of Change.Gabriel Ly - 2007 - Philosophy and Culture 34 (2):155-181.
Hsi Yang Che Hsüeh Ching I.Fan-K. Ang Tseng - 1982 - Chung-Kuo Wen Hua Ta Hsüeh Ch U Pan Pu.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-06

Total views
380 ( #13,329 of 2,255,372 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
150 ( #2,837 of 2,255,372 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature