Comparison between Hegel’s Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching’s Yin-Yang-I (Change)

Asian Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 1 (6):1-15 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article introduces a cross-cultural comparative study on Hegel’s Western triad of Being-Nothing-Becoming and I-Ching (including Tao-Teh-Ching, TTK)’s Eastern triad of Yin-Yang-I (Change). The study exposes the similarities and differences between the two triads in three aspects: concept, internal motivation, and external manifestation. Results include: (1) Hegel’s “Tao” is not identical to that of the Yin-Yang paradigm; (2) Hegel’s envision of Becoming is intrinsically far away from the essence of I-Ching’s I.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Theory of Human Nature in the Philosophy of Change.Gabriel Ly - 2007 - Philosophy and Culture 34 (2):155-181.
Hsi Yang Che Hsüeh Ching I.Fan-K. Ang Tseng - 1982 - Chung-Kuo Wen Hua Ta Hsüeh Ch U Pan Pu.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-06

Downloads
1,422 (#4,270)

6 months
147 (#4,450)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Buddhist Consciousnesses and Psychological Forces.Ma Zhen - 2016 - Asian Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 1 (5):1-15.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references