Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):779 - 788 (2012)

Authors
Haixia Zhong
McMaster University
Abstract
Graham Priest 2002 argues that all logical paradoxes that include set-theoretic paradoxes and semantic paradoxes share a common structure, the Inclosure Schema, so they should be treated as one family. Through a discussion of Berry's Paradox and the semantic notion ?definable?, I argue that (i) the Inclosure Schema is not fine-grained enough to capture the essential features of semantic paradoxes, and (ii) the traditional separation of the two groups of logical paradoxes should be retained
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2011.628324
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics.Alfred Tarski - 1943 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3):341-376.
The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.Alfred Tarski - 1936 - In A. Tarski (ed.), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford University Press. pp. 152--278.
Beyond the Limits of Thought.Graham Priest - 1995 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The Semantic Conception of Truth.Alfred Tarski - 1944 - In Simon Blackburn & Keith Simmons (eds.), Truth. Oxford University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Definition Inclosed: A Reply to Zhong.Graham Priest - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):789 - 795.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Liar Paradox and the Inclosure Schema.Emil Badici - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):583 – 596.
Russell's Schema, Not Priest's Inclosure.Gregory Landini - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (2):105-139.
Definition Inclosed: A Reply to Zhong.Graham Priest - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):789 - 795.
Paradoxes of Intensionality.Dustin Tucker & Richmond H. Thomason - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):394-411.
Logical, Semantic and Cultural Paradoxes.Anna Orlandini - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (1):65-86.
Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Logical Paradoxes.Barry Hartley Slater - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
An Order-Theoretic Account of Some Set-Theoretic Paradoxes.Thomas Forster & Thierry Libert - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-16

Total views
91 ( #126,745 of 2,499,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes