Was Confucius teaching us how to do things with words? Reflections on ethics in language and communication

Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 9 (2):185-200 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As observed by both western and Chinese scholars, despite the cultural and historical distance between them, the works of Confucius and J. L. Austin (together with other scholars of speech act theory) share similar views on the performative dimensions of language. Speech act theory underscores how utterances constitute actions instead of reporting inner mental states of the speakers, while Confucian texts also draw attention to the embeddedness of language in the wider contexts of personal affairs and social order. In this article, we conduct a detailed comparison of the two to demonstrate that their views on language and communication, although sharing some important concerns, differ significantly in two main aspects: (1) The relationship between one’s ‘internal’ cultivation and ‘external’ behaviours; (2) The conceptualization of language and ethics. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of a Confucian outlook for the study of language and communication and point out some directions for future research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Confucius’s view of learning.Yuanbiao Lin - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (13):1180-1191.
Enhancing Intercultural Communication through storytelling in EFL.Marsela Harizaj & Veneranda Hajrulla - 2017 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 1:23-29.
May Chinese Culture be Taught in Teaching Foreigners Chinese Language.Gui-min Tian - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:50-57.
Spinoza’s Language.Mogens Lærke - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):519-547.
The essence of reference.R. M. Sainsbury - 2008 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), he Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Meaning and Communication.Kent Bach - 2012 - In G. Russell & D. G. Fara (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language. London: Routledge. pp. 79--90.
Space, time, shape, and direction: creative discourse in the Timaeus.Catherine Osborne - 1996 - In Christopher Gill & Mary Margaret McCabe (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 179--211.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-03

Downloads
26 (#577,276)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Xiyin Zhou
École Normale Supérieure

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references