Philosophy and Public Affairs 47 (4):378-411 (2019)
AbstractDisagreement persists about when, if at all, disenfranchisement is a fitting response to criminal wrongdoing of type X. Positive retributivists endorse a permissive view of fittingness: on this view, disenfranchising a remarkably wide range of morally serious criminal wrongdoers is justified. But defining fittingness in the context of criminal disenfranchisement in such broad terms is implausible, since many crimes sanctioned via disenfranchisement have little to do with democratic participation in the first place: the link between the nature of a criminal act X (the ‘desert basis’) and a fitting sanction Y is insufficiently direct in such cases. I define a new, much narrower account of the kind of criminal wrongdoing which is a more plausible desert basis for disenfranchisement: ‘political wrongdoing’, such as electioneering, corruption, or conspiracy with foreign powers. I conclude that widespread blanket and post-incarceration disenfranchisement policies are overinclusive, because they disenfranchise persons guilty of serious, but non-political, criminal wrongdoing. While such overinclusiveness is objectionable in any context, it is particularly objectionable in circumstances in which it has additional large-scale collateral consequences, for instance by perpetuating existing structures of racial injustice. At the same time, current policies are underinclusive, thus hindering the aim of holding political wrongdoers accountable.
Similar books and articles
The Limits of Criminal Disenfranchisement.Nicholas Munn - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):223-239.
Foundering democracy: Felony disenfranchisement in the american tradition of vote suppression.Eric J. Miller - manuscript
Democratic Enfranchisement Beyond Citizenship: The All-Affected Principle in Theory and Practice.Annette Zimmermann - 2018 - Dissertation, Oxford University
Penal Disenfranchisement and Equality of Status.Costanza Porro - 2019 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (3):401-414.
Democracy and Disenfranchisement: The Morality of Electoral Exclusions.Claudio López-Guerra - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Punishment and Democratic Rights: A Case Study in Non-Ideal Penal Theory.Steve Swartzer - 2018 - In Molly Gardner & Michael Weber (eds.), The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment. pp. 7-37.
Felon Disenfranchisement and Democratic Legitimacy.Matt S. Whitt - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):283-311.
The Nature and Significance of Culpability.David O. Brink - 2019 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (2):347-373.
The Revolution and the Criminal Law.Adil Ahmad Haque - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):231-253.
Citizenship and Arbitrary Law-Making : On the Quaintness of Non-national Disenfranchisement.Mindus Patricia - unknown
Felon Disenfranchisement and the Argument from Democratic Self-Determination.William Bülow - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (3):759-774.
Liberal and republican arguments against the disenfranchisement of felons.Jeffrey Reiman - 2005 - Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):3-18.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Contributivist views on democratic inclusion: on economic contribution as a condition for the right to vote.Jonas Hultin Rosenberg & Fia Sundevall - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
References found in this work
No references found.