Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion

Malden MA: Blackwell (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,462

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rejoinder to Zimmerman.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2003 - In Michael L. Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Reply to Moser.”.J. Schellenberg - 2003 - In Michael L. Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 54--56.
It is not Rational to Believe in the Resurrection.Michael Martin - 2003 - In Michael L. Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 174--84.
God is Not Male.Kathryn Pogin - 2019 - In Michael Peterson & Ray VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edition. Wiley-Blackwell.
Do mystics see God?Evan Fales - 2003 - In Michael L. Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 145--148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dean Zimmerman
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references