The Monist 79 (1):148-180 (1996)

Dean Zimmerman
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Physical boundaries and the earliest topologists. Topology has a relatively short history; but its 19th century roots are embedded in philosophical problems about the nature of extended substances and their boundaries which go back to Zeno and Aristotle. Although it seems that there have always been philosophers interested in these matters, questions about the boundaries of three-dimensional objects were closest to center stage during the later medieval and modern periods. Are the boundaries of an object actually existing, less-than-three-dimensional parts of the object—that is, are solids bounded by two-dimensional surfaces, surfaces by one-dimensional “edges” or “physical lines”, edges by dimensionless “simples”? If not, how does a perfectly spherical object manage to touch a perfectly flat object—what part of the sphere is in immediate contact with the plane, if the sphere has no unextended parts? But if such parts be admitted, are we not then saddled with “actual infinities” of simples, lines, and surfaces spread throughout each continuous object—the boundaries of all the object’s internal parts? Does it help to say that these internal boundaries exist only “potentially”?
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI monist19967918
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,873
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Infinitesimal Gunk.Lu Chen - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (5):981-1004.
Mereological Commitments.Achille C. Varzi - 2000 - Dialectica 54 (4):283–305.
Spatial Reasoning and Ontology: Parts, Wholes, and Locations.Achille C. Varzi - 2007 - In Marco Aiello, Ian E. Pratt-Hartmann & Johan van Benthem (eds.), Handbook of Spatial Logics. Springer Verlag. pp. 945-1038.
Labyrinth of Continua†.Patrick Reeder - 2018 - Philosophia Mathematica 26 (1):1-39.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dört Boyutlu Değişim.Fatih Öztürk - 2007 - Felsefe Tartismalari 39:29-48.
Objects, Their Parts, and Essences.Karol Polcyn - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (3).
Material Objects: Metaphysical Issues.Cody Sinclair Gilmore - 2004 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Objects: A Study in Kantian Formal Epistemology.Giovanni Boniolo & Silvio Valentini - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (4):457-478.
Hudson on Location. [REVIEW]Josh Parsons - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):427 - 435.
Philosophical Topology.Yi Jiang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:59-74.
Endurantist and Perdurantist Accounts of Persistence.Maureen Donnelly - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (1):27 - 51.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #711,187 of 2,401,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,092 of 2,401,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes