On April 7, 2009 the third section of the European Court of Human Rights issued a judgment in the Case of Mendel vs. Sweden, which is of significance not because it adds another precedent to the long standing case law delimitating the scope of Art. 6 European Convention on Human Rights but because it underlines, once again, the inherent obstacle in the Swedish legal system to providing individuals access to courts for a review of administrative decisions by State authorities.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Human Rights, Citizen Rights: The Presuppositions of the American and European Case Law.Gregory Lewkowicz - unknown
The Real Objective of Mendel's Paper: A Response to Monaghan and Corcos. [REVIEW]Raphael Falk & Sahotra Sarkar - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451.
School Uniforms, Religious Symbols and the Human Rights Act 1998: The 'Purity Ring' Case.Sylvie Bacquet - unknown
A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights.George Letsas - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-05-22
Total downloads5 ( #593,204 of 2,158,107 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #359,001 of 2,158,107 )
How can I increase my downloads?