Review of: Atina Knowles'. ‘Geach’s “Good” and “Bad”, Attributive After All’

Qeios (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I follow the distinction of predicative versus attributive adjectives introduced by P.T. Geach in 1956 and discuss Atina Knowles' arguments contra the revisions of Geach's original conception.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Geach on `good'.Charles R. Pigden - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (159):129-154.
Some remarks on Geach's predicative and attributive adjectives.John Donnelly - 1971 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (1):125-128.
Introduction.Philippa Foot - 2001 - In Natural goodness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodness: Attributive and predicative.Michael-John Turp - 2016 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 11 (2-3):70-87.
Identifying Goodness.Charles R. Pigden - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):93 - 109.
Is anything just plain good?Mahrad Almotahari & Adam Hosein - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1485-1508.
Review of P.T. Geach's The Virtues. [REVIEW]Deborah Achtenberg - 1979 - Review of Metaphysics 33 (2):423-425.
Helen Knight and Margaret Macdonald on the meaning of ‘good’.Oliver Thomas Spinney - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-10

Downloads
200 (#123,692)

6 months
96 (#63,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anton Zimmerling
Pushkin State Russian Language Institute

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references