Abstract
I have argued that contemporary humeans face a trilemma: either give up temporal parts, deny the humean supervenience of causal relations, or deny the possibility of there being a difference between rotating and nonrotating homogeneous spheres. Mark Scala describes an interesting class of seemingly possible objects, spinning and stationary simples; and argues their possibility undermines my argument. I argue that it does not. And I conclude with a more general assessment of the status of objections to humeanism from the possibility of homogeneous objects in motion
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00009.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,825
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Extended Simples.Kris McDaniel - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):131 - 141.
Location and Mereology.Cody Gilmore - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Multiple Location Defended.Antony Eagle - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2215-2231.
Weak Location.Antony Eagle - 2019 - Dialectica 73 (1-2):149-181.
The Hume Literature, 2002.William Edward Morris - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (2):381-400.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Homogeneous Simples.Mark Scala - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):393 - 397.
Spinning Shadows.Roy Sorensen - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):345 - 365.
A Tale of Two Simples.Joshua Spencer - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (2):167 - 181.
Copernicus, the Orbs, and the Equant.Peter Barker - 1990 - Synthese 83 (2):317 - 323.
Simply Possible.Theodore Sider - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):585-590.
The Unity and Diversity of Reasons.John Skorupski - 2009 - In Simon Robertson (ed.), Spheres of Reason. Oxford University Press.
Two Spheres, Twenty Spheres, and the Identity of Indiscernibles.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):480–492.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
113 ( #85,942 of 2,401,553 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #257,496 of 2,401,553 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes