Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):292 – 300 (1965)
It is generally agreed that the argument about Achilles and the tortoise was intended to prove that the concept of movement was contradictory or ambiguous and therefore that it did not belong in the foundations of ontology. It is suggested here that the argument stands unless we are prepared to define a standard time by means of dynamical concepts. It would be a premature assumption, however, to suppose that Zeno himself should have been so prepared
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Zeno's Metrical Paradox of Extension.Adolf Grünbaum - 1967 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 176--199.
Achilles and the Tortoise.Max Black - 1950 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Analysis. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 67-81.
Why Mathematical Solutions of Zeno's Paradoxes Miss the Point: Zeno's One and Many Relation and Parmenides' Prohibition.Alba Papa-Grimaldi - 1996 - Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):299 - 314.
Zeno's Paradoxes.Nicholas Huggett - forthcoming - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Zeno's Boêtheia Tôi Logôi.Phil Hopkins - 2006 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):1-25.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads12 ( #378,825 of 2,172,937 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,815 of 2,172,937 )
How can I increase my downloads?