Studies of intensional contexts in mohist writings

Philosophy East and West 50 (2):208-228 (2000)
Abstract
The Mohist School's logical study focuses mainly on the following inference rule: suppose that N and M are coextensive terms, or N a subset of M; it follows that if a verb can appear in front of N, it can also appear in front of M. That is, if 'VM' then 'VN', where V is some extensional verb. Such an approach to logical inference necessitates the study of logical relations among nouns, verbs, and the relations between these two types of words. Evidence is offered here that the Mohists clearly distinguished extensional verbs from intensional verbs, and that this insight enabled them to say, among other things, that VN does not follow from VM, even in cases where N is M or contained in M, as long as the V in question is an intensional verb
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Later Mohists and Logic.Dan Robins - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (3):247-285.
Later Mohist Logic, Lei, Classes, and Sorts.Thierry Lucas - 2005 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):349–365.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Intensionality: Graeme Forbes.Graeme Forbes - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):75–99.
Intensional Contexts and Intensional Entities.Eric Russert Kraemer - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (1):65 - 66.
Intensional Verbs in Event Semantics.Graeme Forbes - 2010 - Synthese 176 (2):227 - 242.
Indiscernibility of Identicals.Pavel Tichý - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (3):251 - 273.
An Approach to Intensional Logic.Imre Ruzsa - 1981 - Studia Logica 40 (3):269 - 287.
Mohist Canons.Chris Fraser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

27 ( #191,396 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums