Philosophy East and West 50 (2):208-228 (2000)
The Mohist School's logical study focuses mainly on the following inference rule: suppose that N and M are coextensive terms, or N a subset of M; it follows that if a verb can appear in front of N, it can also appear in front of M. That is, if 'VM' then 'VN', where V is some extensional verb. Such an approach to logical inference necessitates the study of logical relations among nouns, verbs, and the relations between these two types of words. Evidence is offered here that the Mohists clearly distinguished extensional verbs from intensional verbs, and that this insight enabled them to say, among other things, that VN does not follow from VM, even in cases where N is M or contained in M, as long as the V in question is an intensional verb
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Later Mohist Logic, Lei, Classes, and Sorts.Thierry Lucas - 2005 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):349–365.
Similar books and articles
Intensionality: Graeme Forbes.Graeme Forbes - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):75–99.
Intensional Contexts and Intensional Entities.Eric Russert Kraemer - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (1):65 - 66.
Intensional Transitive Verbs.Graeme Forbes - 2008 - In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #191,396 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?