Natural law, natural rights, and classical liberalism: On Montesquieu's critique of Hobbes

Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (1):227-251 (2001)
Abstract
Montesquieu is not often thought of as a significant natural law thinker. The article on natural law in the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences discusses many theorists of the natural law, but Montesquieu is not among them. A valuable older survey of natural law theorizing by legal philosopher A. P. d'EntrThomas Aquinas, Hugo Grotius, even Georg Hegel. A yet more comprehensive survey of the topic, Natural Law and Human Dignity, by French philosopher and social theorist Ernst Bloch, does not mention Montesquieu at all
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052501181094
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,567
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Laws, Passion, and the Attractions of Right Action in Montesquieu.Sharon R. Krause - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):211-230.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant.Howard Williams - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90.
On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory.Michael Cuffaro - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.
The Prolife Leviathan.Kody W. Cooper - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):557-581.
Added to PP index
2010-08-31

Total downloads
54 ( #98,911 of 2,180,803 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #153,481 of 2,180,803 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums