DBS and Autonomy: Clarifying the Role of Theoretical Neuroethics

Neuroethics 14 (1):83-93 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, we sketch how theoretical neuroethics can clarify the concept of autonomy. We hope that this can both serve as a model for the conceptual clarification of other components of PIAAAS and contribute to the development of the empirical measures that Gilbert and colleagues [1] propose.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,491

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroethics and the Neuroscientific Turn.Jon Leefmann & Elisabeth Hildt - 2017 - In L. Syd M. Johnson & Karen S. Rommelfanger (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics. New York City, New York, USA: pp. 14-32.
Neuroethics and Animals: Methods and Philosophy.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):182-187.
Intention, autonomy, and brain events.Grant Gillett - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):330-339.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-25

Downloads
35 (#390,014)

6 months
9 (#141,986)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Zuk
Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
The sources of normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.

View all 45 references / Add more references