Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing in Deep Brain Stimulation

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14:578687 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The expansion of research on deep brain stimulation (DBS) and adaptive DBS (aDBS) raises important neuroethics and policy questions related to data sharing. However, there has been little empirical research on the perspectives of experts developing these technologies. We conducted semi-structured, open-ended interviews with aDBS researchers regarding their data sharing practices and their perspectives on ethical and policy issues related to sharing. Researchers expressed support for and a commitment to sharing, with most saying that they were either sharing their data or would share in the future and that doing so was important for advancing the field. However, those who are sharing reported a variety of sharing partners, suggesting heterogeneity in sharing practices and lack of the broad sharing that would reflect principles of open science. Researchers described several concerns and barriers related to sharing, including privacy and confidentiality, the usability of shared data by others, ownership and control of data (including potential commercialization), and limited resources for sharing. They also suggested potential solutions to these challenges, including additional safeguards to address privacy issues, standardization and transparency in analysis to address issues of data usability, professional norms and heightened cooperation to address issues of ownership and control, and streamlining of data transmission to address resource limitations. Researchers also offered a range of views on the sensitivity of neural activity data (NAD) and data related to mental health in the context of sharing. These findings are an important input to deliberations by researchers, policymakers, neuroethicists, and other stakeholders as they navigate ethics and policy questions related to aDBS research.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,718

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science?Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Openness in the social sciences: Sharing data.Joan E. Sieber - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):69 – 86.
Data Sharing in the Context of Health-Related Citizen Science.Mary A. Majumder & Amy L. McGuire - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):167-177.
Challenges of web-based personal genomic data sharing.Pascal Borry & Mahsa Shabani - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-13.
Cracking the Code: Using Data to Combat the Opioid Crisis.Catherine Martinez - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (2):454-471.


Added to PP

24 (#556,967)

6 months
6 (#200,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Zuk
Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School

References found in this work

The sources of normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine Korsgaard - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):384-394.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.

View all 21 references / Add more references