Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1117-1130 (2016)

Authors
Federico Zuolo
Università degli Studi di Genova
Abstract
Although the idea of dignity has always been applied to human beings and although its role is far from being uncontroversial, some recent works in animal ethics have tried to apply the idea of dignity to animals. The aim of this paper is to discuss critically whether these attempts are convincing and sensible. In order to assess these proposals, I put forward two formal conditions that any conception of dignity must meet and outline three main approaches which might justify the application of dignity to animals: the species-based approach, moral individualism and the relational approach. Discussing in particular works by Martha Nussbaum and Michael Meyer I argue that no approach can convincingly justify the extension of dignity to animals because all fail to meet the formal conditions and do not provide an appropriate basis for animal dignity. I conclude by arguing that the recognition of the moral importance of animals and their defense should appeal to other normative concepts which are more appropriate than dignity.
Keywords Animals  Dignity  Moral status  Respect  Speciesism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-016-9695-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Respect and the Basis of Equality.Ian Carter - 2011 - Ethics 121 (3):538-571.
Undignified Bioethics.Alasdair Cochrane - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What do we owe to intelligent robots?John-Stewart Gordon - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):209-223.
Human Rights Without Human Supremacism.Will Kymlicka - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):763-792.
Nature of Dignity and Human Dignity.Vasil Gluchman - 2017 - Human Affairs 27 (2):131-144.
Should Cultured Meat Be Refused in the Name of Animal Dignity?David Chauvet - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (2):387-411.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Persons, Human Beings, and Respect.Peter Baumann - 2007 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):5-17.
Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity.Paul Formosa & Catriona Mackenzie - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):875-892.
Human Dignity as High Moral Status.Manuel Toscano - 2011 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 6 (2):4-25.
Dignity as a Moral Concept.Colin Bird - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):150-176.
Undignified Bioethics.Alasdair Cochrane - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.
By.Craig Duncan - manuscript
Human Dignity as a Right.Shaoping Gan - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370-384.
Human Dignity and the Constitution.Paul Sourlas - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (1):30-46.
Dignity, Law and Language-Games.Mary Neal - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (1):107-122.
Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Appeal to Separate the Conjoined Twins.Doris Schroeder - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323 - 335.
Human Dignity, Rights and Self-Control.Michael Joseph Meyer - 1987 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-10

Total views
89 ( #122,460 of 2,455,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #179,407 of 2,455,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes