Forma Lógica das Proposições Científicas e Ontologia da Predicação: um dilema na filosofia da ciência de Aristóteles


Authors
Breno Andrade Zuppolini
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Abstract
In the Posterior Analytics, Aristotle imposes some requirements on scientific propositions: (i) they must be susceptible of syllogistic articulation, (ii) they must have universal terms as subjects of predication and (iii) their subjects must be primary, i.e. they cannot “be said of a distinct underlying subject”. However, it is problematic to meet those three requirements together. If associated with the theory of predication in Categories, the requirement (iii) shall prescribe names or descriptions of individuals within the category of substance as subjects of predication, which are primary insofar as they cannot play the logical role of predicate. Nevertheless, if the requirement (i) is satisfied, then the terms of scientific proposition would be able to perform the function of subject as well as of predicate since the rules of conversion and syllogistic moods presuppose the interchangeability among terms of predication. The requirement (ii), by its turn, withdraws all particular subjects from scientific propositions and a fortiori individual substances. We offer as a solution for the aforementioned dilemma the association of theses from the Posterior Analytics, not with the treatise Categories, but with the new ontology of predication emerged in the Metaphysics, which, by introducing the hylomorphic analysis of compound substances, admits primary and notwithstanding universal subjects of predication: the specific forms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Aristóteles, Segundos Analíticos, Livro I.Lucas Angioni - 2004 - Campinas, Brazil: Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de Campinas.
The Origins of Aristotelian Science.Michael Ferejohn - 1991 - Philosophical Review 102 (1):87-89.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

General Terms and Logical Subjects.Michael Durrant - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):525 - 538.
Aristotle on Predication.Phil Corkum - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):793-813.
Substances.S. Marc Cohen - 2009 - In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Blackwell-Wiley.
Forms and Predication Reconsidered.Anne M. Wiles - 2014 - Studia Gilsoniana 3:241-256.
P. F. Strawson on Predication.Danny Frederick - 2011 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):39-57.
A Subject-Comment Account of Predication.Bo Mou - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:167-191.
Aristotle on Exceptions to Essences in Biology.Petter Sandstad - 2016 - In Benedikt Strobel & Georg Wöhrle (eds.), Angewandte Epistemologie in antiker Philosophie und Wissenschaft, AKAN-Einzelschriften 11. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier. pp. 69-92.
L’analisi Aristotelica Dei Relativi.Enrico Rini - 2010 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 65 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-31

Total views
290 ( #21,862 of 2,279,963 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
108 ( #5,330 of 2,279,963 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature