Asian Bioethics Review 10 (2):105-121 (2018)

Open visiting policy in intensive care units is considered a favorable visiting regime that may benefit patients and their family members as well as medical staff. The article examines the conditions and causes of OVP-making process in Ukraine and presents the ethical analysis of its implications with respect to the key stakeholders: ICU patients, family members, and medical staff. The OVP, established by the Ministry of Health in June, 2016, changes current approaches to the recognition of the role of families in critically ill patients’ care dramatically; it does, however, have serious shortcomings. The analysis of risks and benefits showed that OVP does not adequately cater to the needs of all the key players—family members, patients, and medical staff. Moreover, there is no clear mechanism to control OVP implementation via feedback from all the key players. These issues give rise to a concern that the implementation of OVP will die on the vine. In order to prevent this, a range of measures is required: the optimization of the ICU facilities and internal procedures, supervision of OVP implementation by policy-makers, training of medical staff, and providing family members with educational programs. Considering current shortcomings, it is crucially important to develop clear and consistent internal guidelines in hospitals that will guarantee the introduction of open ICU visiting and quality of critical care provisions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s41649-018-0057-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,104
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Criterialism Versus Deliberativism.Cheryl Misak - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):408-414.
The Ukraine Crisis and Shift in Us Foreign Policy.Michał Woźniak - 2016 - International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 18 (2):87-102.
“Canada Will Not Stand Idly By...”: Ukraine in the Foreign Policy of Canada.Magdalena Marczuk-Karbownik - 2016 - International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal 18 (2):121-131.
Decision-Making in Intensive Care--A Reply to Sundström.K. Hall - 1994 - Health Care Analysis: Hca: Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy 2 (4):336.


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,383,433 of 2,428,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,645 of 2,428,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes