Biotechnology and naturalness in the genomics era: Plotting a timetable for the biotechnology debate [Book Review]

Abstract
Debates on the role of biotechnology in food production are beset with notorious ambiguities. This already applies to the term “biotechnology” itself. Does it refer to the use and modification of living organisms in general, or rather to a specific set of technologies developed quite recently in the form of bioengineering and genetic modification? No less ambiguous are discussions concerning the question to what extent biotechnology must be regarded as “unnatural.” In this article it will be argued that, in order to disentangle some of the ambiguities involved, we have to broaden the temporal horizon of the debate. Ideas about biotechniques and naturalness have evolved in various socio-historical contexts and their historical origins will determine to a considerable extent their actual meaning and use in contemporary deliberations. For this purpose, a comprehensive timetable is developed, beginning with the Neolithic revolution ~10,000 years ago (resulting in the emergence of agriculture and the Common Human Pattern) up to the biotech revolution as it has evolved from the 1970s onwards—sometimes referred to as a second “Genesis.” The concept of nature that emerged in the context of the “Common Human Pattern” differs considerably from traditional philosophical concepts of nature (such as coined by Aristotle), as well as from the scientific view of nature conveyed by the contemporary life sciences. A clarification of these different historical backdrops will allow us to understand and elucidate the conceptual ambiguities that are at work in contemporary debates on biotechnology and the place of human beings in nature.
Keywords Naturalness  Biotechnology  Food ethics  Genomics  Neolithic revolution  Genetic engineering
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-009-9178-1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,530
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Republic. Plato & C. D. C. Reeve - 1974 - Princeton: Hackett Publishing.
The Unnatural Nature of Science.L. Wolpert - 1992 - Harvard University Press.
A Short History of Food Ethics.Hub Zwart - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):113-126.
The Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle - 1951 - Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Beyond “Second Animals”: Making Sense of Plant Ethics. [REVIEW]Sylvie Pouteau - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (1):1-25.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Biotechnology is Compatible with Sustainable Agriculture.Donald N. Duvick - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):112-125.
How Not to Interpret the Advances of Biotechnology.Giridhari L. Pandit - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):93-102.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
Added to PP index
2009-07-04

Total downloads
28 ( #195,697 of 2,210,802 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #357,944 of 2,210,802 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature