Hemispheric differences in semantic-relatedness judgments
Cognition 87 (3):B79-B86 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00235-4
My notes
Similar books and articles
Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel processing.Gillian Cohen - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):349.
Effects of semantic and acoustic relatedness on free recall and clustering.William E. Forrester & David J. King - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (1):16.
The effect of context upon judgments of pitch differences.T. Koester & W. N. Schoenfeld - 1946 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 36 (5):417.
Bill Gates is not a parking meter: Philosophical quality control in automated ontology building.Catherine Legg & Samuel Sarjant - 2012 - Proceedings of the Symposium on Computational Philosophy, AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012 (Birmingham, England, July 2-6).
Semantic relatedness and clustering in free recall.May F. D’Amato - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (2):153-155.
What counts in grammatical number agreement?Laurel Brehm & Kathryn Bock - 2013 - Cognition 128 (2):149-169.
Semantic relatedness and the processing of upcoming words in sentences.Pj Schwanenflugel - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):337-337.
Attention, awareness, and hemispheric differences in word recognition.G. Underwood - 1977 - Neuropsychologia 15:61-67.
Hemispheric differences in recognition memory for letters.Kim Kirsner - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (1):2-4.
Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals.Ishmael P. Akaah - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (5):375 - 381.
Bruno Kohn and Maureen Dennis.of Hemispheric Specialization & Infantile Hemiplegia - 1974 - In Marcel Kinsbourne & W. Smith (eds.), Hemispheric Disconnection and Cerebral Function. Charles C.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
23 (#501,637)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2014-01-20
Downloads
23 (#501,637)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context‐Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects.Lauren A. M. Lebois, Christine D. Wilson-Mendenhall & Lawrence W. Barsalou - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (8):1764-1801.
Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension.Rolf A. Zwaan, Carol J. Madden, Richard H. Yaxley & Mark E. Aveyard - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (4):611-619.
Meaning is Not a Reflex: Context Dependence of Spatial Congruity Effects.Daniel Casasanto, Geoffrey Brookshire & Richard Ivry - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (8):1979-1986.
Transitivity, Space, and Hand: The Spatial Grounding of Syntax.Timothy W. Boiteau & Amit Almor - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (4):848-891.
References found in this work
Perceptual symbol systems.Lawrence W. Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):577-660.
A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Thomas K. Landauer & Susan T. Dumais - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):211-240.
Words in the brain's language. PulvermÜ & Friedemann Ller - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):253-279.
