Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):147-165 (2008)
AbstractThe fact that persons are separate in some descriptive sense is relatively uncontroversial. But one of the distinctive ideas of contemporary liberal political philosophy is that the descriptive fact of our separateness is normatively momentous. John Rawls and Robert Nozick both take the separateness of persons to provide a foundation for their rejection of utilitarianism and for their own positive political theories. So why do their respective versions of liberalism look so different? This paper claims that the difference is based in Rawls' and Nozick's differing understandings of the morally significant aspects of personhood, and argues that respect for separateness is a value better suited to defend Nozickian libertarianism than Rawlsian liberalism.
Similar books and articles
Natural Separateness: Why Parfit's Reductionist Account of Persons Fails to Support Consequentialism.Tim Christie - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):178-195.
Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons.Alex Voorhoeve & Marc Fleurbaey - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (3):381-398.
Altruism and the separateness of persons.Sam Black - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (3):361-385.
Alienation and the Alleged Separateness of Persons.Carol Rovane - 2004 - The Monist 87 (4):554-572.
Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons.Dennis McKerlie - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):205 - 225.
Aggregation, Rights, and the Separateness of Persons.Alastair Norcross - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (1):1-15.
Two dogmas of deontology: Aggregation, rights, and the separateness of persons: Alastair Norcross.Alastair Norcross - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):76-95.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Contractarian ethics and Harsanyi’s two justifications of utilitarianism.Michael Moehler - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):24-47.
On environmental justice, Part II: non-absolute equal division of rights to the natural world.Joseph Mazor - forthcoming - Economics and Philosophy.
One-by-one: moral theory for separate persons.Bastian Steuwer - 2020 - Dissertation, London School of Economics
Income Redistribution, Body Part Redistribution, and Respect for the Separateness of Persons.Joseph Mazor - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 16 (3).
Sufficientarian-Libertarianism and Basic Income.Akio Fukuhara - 2019 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 1 (1):35-61.