Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):27-36 (2011)
Whatever else might be said about the Lockean and Hobbesian states of nature, it is widely believe that they are mutually incompatible. One or the other (or neither) is a correct way of thinking about the state of nature, but not both. This paper argues that this intuitively plausible claim is incorrect - if not as a matter of textual interpretation, then as a matter of analysis of the concepts that we have inherited from those texts. Not only does it make sense to talk about a Hobbesian and Lockean state of nature existing simultaneously, but doing so allows us to draw important and novel insights about important contemporary questions in political philosophy
|Keywords||Hobbes Locke political authority natural rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hobbes's Theory of Rights – a Modern Interest Theory.Eleanor Curran - 2002 - Journal of Ethics 6 (1):63-86.
Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.Henrik Syse - 2007 - St. Augustine's Press.
Toward a Theory of Empirical Natural Rights.John Hasnas - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):111-147.
State of Nature or Eden?: Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings.Helen Thornton - 2005 - University of Rochester Press.
Questioning Authority: Political Resistance and the Ethic of Natural Science.Diana M. Judd - 2008 - Transaction Publishers.
Added to index2010-07-21
Total downloads91 ( #56,360 of 2,163,655 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,897 of 2,163,655 )
How can I increase my downloads?