Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):27-36 (2011)

Authors
Matt Zwolinski
University of San Diego
Abstract
Whatever else might be said about the Lockean and Hobbesian states of nature, it is widely believe that they are mutually incompatible. One or the other (or neither) is a correct way of thinking about the state of nature, but not both. This paper argues that this intuitively plausible claim is incorrect - if not as a matter of textual interpretation, then as a matter of analysis of the concepts that we have inherited from those texts. Not only does it make sense to talk about a Hobbesian and Lockean state of nature existing simultaneously, but doing so allows us to draw important and novel insights about important contemporary questions in political philosophy
Keywords Hobbes  Locke  political authority  natural rights
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10790-010-9253-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,025
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-21

Total views
112 ( #93,119 of 2,439,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,110 of 2,439,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes