The paradox of increase

The Monist 89 (3):390-417 (2006)
Authors
Eric T. Olson
University of Sheffield
Abstract
It seems evident that things sometimes get bigger by acquiring new parts. But there is an ancient argument purporting to show that this is impossible: the paradox of increase or growing argument.i Here is a sketch of the paradox. Suppose we have an object, A, and we want to make it bigger by adding a part, B. That is, we want to bring it about that A first lacks and then has B as a part. Imagine, then, that we conjoin B to A in some appropriate way. Never mind what A and B are, or what this conjoining amounts to: let A be anything that can gain a part if anything can gain a part, and let B be the sort of thing that can become a part of A, and suppose we do whatever it would take to make B come to be a part of A if this is possible at all. Have we thereby made B a part of A? It seems not. We seem only to have brought it about that B is attached to A, like this
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist200689318
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,496
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animalism.Andrew M. Bailey - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):867-883.
Parts and Wholes.Kris McDaniel - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (5):412-425.
Imperfect Identity.Eric T. Olson - 2006 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (2):81-98.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
Change and the Eternal Part of the Mind in Spinoza.Michael Lebuffe - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):369-384.
Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox.Larry S. Temkin - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (2):138-187.
What 'Must' and 'Can' Must and Can Mean.Angelika Kratzer - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.
Trends Toward Part-Time Employment: Ethical Issues. [REVIEW]Julia J. Bartkowiak - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):811 - 815.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
144 ( #41,543 of 2,287,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,932 of 2,287,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature