- Peer disagreement and higher order evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.details
|
|
You Can't Trust a Philosopher.Richard Fumerton - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement.Alvin I. Goldman - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 187-215.details
|
|
Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The moral evil demons.Ralph Wedgwood - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
In Defense of Anarchism.Robert Paul Wolff (ed.) - 1970 - University of California Press.details
|
|
The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits.Thomas Christiano - 2010 - Oxford University Press.details
|
|
In Defense of Anarchism by Robert Paul Wolff. [REVIEW]Gerald Dworkin - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (18):561-567.details
|
|
Why lotteries are just.Peter Stone - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (3):276–295.details
|
|
Why Lotteries Are Just.Peter Stone - 2007 - Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (3):276-295.details
|
|
Why majority rule cannot be based only on procedural equality.Ben Saunders - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (1):113-122.details
|
|
The equality of lotteries.Ben Saunders - 2008 - Philosophy 83 (3):359-372.details
|
|
Democracy, political equality, and majority rule.Ben Saunders - 2010 - Ethics 121 (1):148-177.details
|
|
Law and Disagreement.Arthur Ripstein & Jeremy Waldron - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):611.details
|
|
Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.details
|
|
The enfranchisement lottery.Claudio Lopez-Guerra - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):1470594-10372206.details
|
|
The enfranchisement lottery.Claudio López-Guerra - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):211-233.details
|
|
Some remarks on the probability of cycles - Appendix 3 to 'Epistemic democracy: generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem'.Christian List - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277-306.details
|
|
Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem.Christian List & Robert E. Goodin - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.details
|
|
The persuasiveness of democratic majorities.Robert E. Goodin & David Estlund - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):131-142.details
|
|
Justificatory liberalism: an essay on epistemology and political theory.Gerald F. Gaus - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Epistemic Democracy with Defensible Premises.Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann - 2013 - Economics and Philosophy 29 (1):87--120.details
|
|
Law and Disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.details
|
|
Law and disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition.John Rawls - 2005 - Columbia University Press.details
|
|
Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework.David M. Estlund - 2008 - Princeton University Press.details
|
|
Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy.Richard Bellamy - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation.Cheryl Misak - 1999 - New York: Routledge.details
|
|
The morality of conflict: reasonable disagreement and the law.Samantha Besson - 2005 - Portland, Or.: Hart.details
|
|
Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework.David Estlund - 2008 - Critica 42 (124):118-125.details
|
|
Two epistemic accounts of democratic legitimacy.David Hershenov - manuscriptdetails
|
|