Switch to: Citations

References in:

Newcomb's paradox and compatibilism

Erkenntnis 25 (2):197 - 220 (1986)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Ifs and cans.J. L. Austin - 1956 - In Austin J. L. (ed.), Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 42. pp. 109-132.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   125 citations  
  • Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
    The influence of J. L. Austin on contemporary philosophy was substantial during his lifetime, and has grown greatly since his death, at the height of his powers, in 1960. Philosophical Papers, first published in 1961, was the first of three volumes of Austin's work to be edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock. Together with Sense and Sensibilia and How to do things with Words, it has extended Austin's influence far beyond the circle who knew him or read (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   396 citations  
  • Counterfactual conundrum.Joan Weiner - 1979 - Noûs 13 (4):499-509.
  • Causal necessity: a pragmatic investigation of the necessity of laws.Brian Skyrms - 1980 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • The unpredictability of free choices.G. Schlesinger - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):209-221.
  • Newcomb’s Paradox and the Direction of Causation.John L. Mackie - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):213 - 225.
    Newcomb's paradox was first presented by Robert Nozick and has been discussed by a considerable number of writers. You are playing a game with a Being who seems to have extraordinary predictive powers. Before you are two boxes, in one of which you can see $1,000. The other is closed and you cannot see what it contains, but you know that the Being has put a million dollars into it if he has predicted that you will take it only, but (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • ”Why Ain’cha Rich?’.David Lewis - 1981 - Noûs 15 (3):377-380.
  • Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow.David Lewis - 1979 - Noûs 13 (4):455-476.
  • Newcomb’s Many Problems.Isaac Levi - 1975 - Theory and Decision 6 (2):161-175.
  • Newcomb's many problems.Isaac Levi - 1978 - In A. Hooker, J. J. Leach & E. F. McClennen (eds.), Theory and Decision. D. Reidel. pp. 369--383.
  • Causality, utility, and decision.Ellery Eells - 1981 - Synthese 48 (2):295 - 329.
  • Newcomb's paradox.James Cargile - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):234-239.
  • Newcomb’s Paradox Revisited.Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (4):295-304.
  • Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice.Robert Nozick - 1969 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Reidel. pp. 114--146.
  • Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility.Allan Gibbard & William L. Harper - 1978 - In A. Hooker, J. J. Leach & E. F. McClennen (eds.), Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory. D. Reidel. pp. 125-162.
  • Prisoners' dilemma is a newcomb problem.David K. Lewis - 1979 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (3):235-240.