Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Impersonal Friends.Jennifer E. Whiting - 1991 - The Monist 74 (1):3-29.
    The rationality of concern for oneself has been taken for granted by the authors of western moral and political thought in a way in which the rationality of concern for others has not. While various authors have differed about the morality of self-concern, and about the extent to which such concern is rationally required, few have doubted that we have at least some special reasons to care for our selves, reasons that differ either in degree or in kind from those (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • Socratic Inquiry and Politics:Socrates and the State. Richard Kraut; Times Literary Supplement. Gregory Vlastos.T. H. Irwin - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):400-.
  • Nicomachean Ethics.C. C. W. Taylor - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):247.
  • Egoism, love, and political office in Plato.Richard Kraut - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (3):330-344.
  • Friendship, Virtue, and Impartiality.Diane Jeske - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):51-72.
    The two dominant contemporary moral theories, Kantianism and utilitarianism, have difficulty accommodating our commonsense understanding of friendship as a relationship with significant moral implications. The difficulty seems to arise from their underlying commitment to impartiality, to the claim that all persons are equally worthy of concern. Aristotelian accounts of friendship are partialist in so far as they defend certain types of friendship by appeal to the claim that some persons, the virtuous, are in fact more worthy of concern than are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Aristippus Against Happiness.T. H. Irwin - 1991 - The Monist 74 (1):55-82.
    Many Greek moralists are eudaemonists; they assume that happiness is the ultimate end of rational human action. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and most of their successors treat this assumption as the basis of their ethical argument. But not all Greek moralists agree; and since the eudaemonist assumption may not seem as obviously correct to us as it seems to many Greek moralists, it is worth considering the views of those Greeks who dissent from it.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • The View from Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 92 (2):280-281.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   780 citations  
  • The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1903 - International Journal of Ethics 13 (2):251-254.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   320 citations  
  • Love and Friendship in Plato and Aristotle.Anthony Price - 1990 - Mind 99 (395):487-489.
    Book synopsis: Reissued in 1997 with corrections and a new Afterword, this book fully explores for the first time an idea common to Plato and Aristotle, which unites their treatments - otherwise very different - of love and friendship. The idea is that although persons are separate, their lives need not be. One person's life may overflow into another's, and as such, helping another person is a way of serving oneself. The author shows how their view of love and friendship, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  • Basic Christian Ethics. By Robert G. Stephens.Paul Ramsey & Thomas J. Higgins - 1950 - Ethics 61 (3):235-236.