Switch to: Citations

References in:

Rationality, Normativity, and Transparency

Mind 118 (470):353-367 (2009)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Normative requirements.John Broome - 1999 - Ratio 12 (4):398–419.
    Normative requirements are often overlooked, but they are central features of the normative world. Rationality is often thought to consist in acting for reasons, but following normative requirements is also a major part of rationality. In particular, correct reasoning – both theoretical and practical – is governed by normative requirements rather than by reasons. This article explains the nature of normative requirements, and gives examples of their importance. It also describes mistakes that philosophers have made as a result of confusing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   407 citations  
  • What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    In this book, T. M. Scanlon offers new answers to these questions, as they apply to the central part of morality that concerns what we owe to each other.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2435 citations  
  • Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
    Normativity involves two kinds of relation. On the one hand, there is the relation of being a reason for. This is a relation between a fact and an attitude. On the other hand, there are relations specified by requirements of rationality. These are relations among a person's attitudes, viewed in abstraction from the reasons for them. I ask how the normativity of rationality—the sense in which we ‘ought’ to comply with requirements of rationality—is related to the normativity of reasons—the sense (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   487 citations  
  • Thinking how to live.Allan Gibbard - 2003 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    An original and elegant work of metaethics, this book brings a new clarity and rigor to the discussion of these tangled issues, and will significantly alter the ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   402 citations  
  • Allan Gibbard, Thinking How to Live. [REVIEW]David O. Brink - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):267-272.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   229 citations  
  • Comments on Gibbard’s Thinking How to Live.Allan Gibbard - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):699-706.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   298 citations  
  • Contextualism in philosophy: knowledge, meaning, and truth.Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    In epistemology and in philosophy of language there is fierce debate about the role of context in knowledge, understanding, and meaning. Many contemporary epistemologists take seriously the thesis that epistemic vocabulary is context-sensitive. This thesis is of course a semantic claim, so it has brought epistemologists into contact with work on context in semantics by philosophers of language. This volume brings together the debates, in a set of twelve specially written essays representing the latest work by leading figures in the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Knowledge, context, and the agent's point of view.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 91--114.
    Contextualism is relativism tamed. Relativism about truth is usually motivated by the idea of no-fault disagreement. Imagine two parties: one (she) says ‘P’; the other (he) says ‘Not P’.1 Apparently, if P then ‘P’ is true and ‘Not P’ false, so she is right and he is wrong; if not P then ‘P’ is false and ‘Not P’ true, so he is right and she is wrong. In both cases, there is an asymmetry between the two parties. Since P or (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth.Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter - 2005 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (5):617-629.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations