References in work:

David J. Chalmers (1993). Connectionism and Compositionality: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn Were Wrong.

5 found
Are we missing references?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add references for the above work:

  1.  59
    Microcognition.Andy Clark - 1989 - MIT Press.
  2. Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity: Why Smolensky's Solution Doesn't Work.Jerry A. Fodor & Brian P. McLaughlin - 1990 - Cognition 35 (2):183-205.
  3. Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture.Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):3-71.
    This paper explores the difference between Connectionist proposals for cognitive a r c h i t e c t u r e a n d t h e s o r t s o f m o d e l s t hat have traditionally been assum e d i n c o g n i t i v e s c i e n c e . W e c l a i m t h a t t h (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   490 citations  
  4.  20
    Settling Into a New Paradigm.Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 26 (S1):97-113.
  5.  61
    The Constituent Structure of Connectionist Mental States: A Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (S1):137-161.