References in work:

Frederik Voetmann Christiansen (2006). Heinrich Hertz's Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science, and its Development by Harald Høffding.

11 found
Are we missing references?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add references for the above work:

  1.  33
    Hertz and Wittgenstein.Peter Barker - 1980 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 11 (3):243-256.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms.Cassirer Ernst - 1953 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
    v. 1. Language.--v. 2. Mythical thought.--v. 3. The phenomenology of knowledge.--v. 4. The metaphysics of symbolic forms.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   73 citations  
  3. Kant and the Exact Sciences.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Harvard University Press.
    In this new book, Michael Friedman argues that Kant's continuing efforts to find a metaphysics that could provide a foundation for the sciences is of the utmost ...
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   80 citations  
  4.  63
    The Principles of Scientific Thinking.Rom Harré - 1970 - London: Macmillan.
  5. Modern Philosophers and Lectures on Bergson.Harald Hoffding - 1915 - Philosophical Review 24:670.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. On Analogy and its Philosophical Importance.Harald Höffding - 1905 - Mind 14 (54):199 - 209.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  8
    Kantian Metaphysics and Hertzian Mechanics.David Hyder - 2003 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 10:35-46.
  8. Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   451 citations  
  9.  3
    Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft.Immanuel Kant - 1786 - Felix Meiner Verlag.
    Kants "Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft" von 1786 stehen ihrem Anspruch nach zwischen einer transzendentalen Kritik der Vernunft – Kant bereitete zur selben Zeit die in wesentlichen Stücken umgearbeitete zweite Auflage der KrV vor – und der Physik als empirischer Wissenschaft.Die Notwendigkeit einer Reflexion über die Naturwissenschaft verhilft dieser Schrift heute wieder zu systematischer Relevanz, nachdem sie lange Zeit nur aus dem Blickwinkel ihrer Bedeutsamkeit für die empirische Naturwissenschaft betrachtet und infolgedessen allenfalls aus wissenschaftshistorischem Interesse rezipiert wurde.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  10.  31
    Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff - 1980 - University of Chicago Press.
    The now-classic Metaphors We Live By changed our understanding of metaphor and its role in language and the mind. Metaphor, the authors explain, is a fundamental mechanism of mind, one that allows us to use what we know about our physical and social experience to provide understanding of countless other subjects. Because such metaphors structure our most basic understandings of our experience, they are "metaphors we live by"--metaphors that can shape our perceptions and actions without our ever noticing them. In (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   459 citations  
  11.  90
    The Loss of World in the Image. Origin and Development of the Concept of Image in the Thought of Hermann von Helmholtz and Heinrich Hertz.Gregor Schiemann - 1998 - In D. Baird (ed.), Heinrich Hertz. Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    In searching for the origins of current conceptions of science in the history of physics, one encounters a remarkable phenomenon. A typical view today is that theoretical knowledge-claims have only relativized validity. Historically, however, this thesis was supported by proponents of a conception of nature that today is far from typical, a mechanistic conception within which natural phenomena were to be explained by the action of mechanically moved matter. Two of these proponents, Hermann von Helmholtz and his pupil Heinrich Hertz, (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   4 citations