References in work:

Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge (2011). Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability. [REVIEW]

10 found
Order:
Are we missing references?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add references for the above work:

  1.  51
    Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility.Michael L. Barnett - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.
    This paper argues that research on the business case for corporate social responsibility (CSR) must account for the path dependent nature of firm-stakeholderrelations, and develops the construct of stakeholder influence capacity (SIC) to fill this void. SIC helps to explain why the effects of CSR on corporate financial performance (CFP) vary across firms and across time, therein providing a missing link in the study of the business case. This paper distinguishes CSR from related and confounded corporate resource allocations and from (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   79 citations  
  2.  6
    Bridging the Gap Between the Promise and Performance of Socially Responsible Funds.S. Prakash Sethi Donald H. Schepers - 2003 - Business and Society Review 108 (1):11-32.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  3.  38
    Thirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: What (If Anything) Have We Learnt?Rob Gray - 2001 - Business Ethics 10 (1):9–15.
    In an increasingly complex world with increasingly powerful organisations it seems inevitable that society – or groups in society – would become anxious about whether these organisations could be encouraged to match that power with an appropriate responsibility. This is the function of accountability – to require individuals and organisations to present an account of those actions for which society holds them – or would wish to hold them – responsible. And the history of social accounting, at its most fundamental, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  4.  33
    The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research.Jennifer J. Griffin & John F. Mahon - 1997 - Business and Society 36 (1):5-31.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   84 citations  
  5. Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.Michael C. Jensen - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):235-256.
    Abstract: In this article, I offer a proposal to clarify what I believe is the proper relation between value maximization and stakeholder theory, which I call enlightened value maximization. Enlightened value maximization utilizes much of the structure of stakeholder theory but accepts maximization of the long-run value of the firm as the criterion for making the requisite tradeoffs among its stakeholders, and specifies long-term value maximization or value seeking as the firm’s objective. This proposal therefore solves the problems that arise (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   190 citations  
  6.  47
    A Resource-Based-View of the Socially Responsible Firm: Stakeholder Interdependence, Ethical Awareness, and Issue Responsiveness as Strategic Assets. [REVIEW]Reginald A. Litz - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (12):1355 - 1363.
    In recent years the resource-based view of the firm has made significant headway in explaining differences in interfirm performance. However, this perspective has not considered the social and ethical dimensions of organizational resources. This paper seeks to provide such an integration. Using Kuhn's three stage model of adaptive behavior, the resource worthiness of stakeholder management, business ethics, and issues management are explored. The paper concludes by drawing on prospect theory to understand the reasons for this conceptual lacuna.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  7.  3
    Commitment, Revelation, and the Testaments of Belief: The Metrics of Measurement of Corporate Social Performance.Barry M. Mitnick - 2000 - Business and Society 39 (4):419-465.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  8.  4
    A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance.Tim Rowley & Shawn Berman - 2000 - Business and Society 39 (4):397-418.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   63 citations  
  9.  3
    A Critique of Social Investing's Diversity Measures.Donald H. Schepers - 2003 - Business and Society Review 108 (4):487-508.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  10.  58
    Sustainable Corporate Finance.Aloy Soppe - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):213-224.
    This paper presents and illustrates the concept of sustainable corporate finance. Sustainability is a well-established concept in the disciplines of environmental economics and business ethics. The paper uses a broader definition of what is called the firm to pinpoint sustainability to the finance literature. The concept of sustainable finance is compared to traditional and behavioral finance. Four criteria are used to systematically analyze the basic differences. First on the order is the theory of the firm: the definition of the firm (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations