Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Methodological individualism and explanation.Raimo Tuomela - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):133-140.
    This critical note concerns Harold Kincaid's "Reduction, Explanation and Empiricism" (this journal, December 1986). Kincaid criticizes methodological individualism on several grounds. The present note argues that Kincaid fails at least in his attempt to show that it is false that individualistic theory suffices to fully explain social phenomena. Kincaid's main reason for claiming that individualistic theory is insufficient is that it cannot adequately explain social kinds. The present note contends that an individualist can suitably reinterpret the social talk in question (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Supervenience Doesn’t Entail Reducibility.Harold Kincaid - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):343-56.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Supervenience and explanation.Harold Kincaid - 1988 - Synthese 77 (November):251-81.
    This paper explores the explanatory adequacy of lower-level theories when their higher-level counterparts are irreducible. If some state or entity described by a high-level theory supervenes upon and is realized in events, entities, etc. described by the relevant lower-level theory, does the latter fully explain the higher-level event even if the higher-level theory is irreducible? While the autonomy of the special sciences and the success of various eliminativist programs depends in large part on how we answer this question, neither the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Reduction, explanation, and individualism.Harold Kincaid - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (4):492-513.
    This paper contributes to the recently renewed debate over methodological individualism (MI) by carefully sorting out various individualist claims and by making use of recent work on reduction and explanation outside the social sciences. My major focus is on individualist claims about reduction and explanation. I argue that reductionist versions of MI fail for much the same reasons that mental predicates cannot be reduced to physical predicates and that attempts to establish reducibility by weakening the requirements for reduction also fail. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  • Defending laws in the social sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
    This article defends laws in the social sciences. Arguments against social laws are considered and rejected based on the "open" nature of social theory, the multiple realizability of social predicates, the macro and/or teleological nature of social laws, and the inadequacies of belief-desire psychology. The more serious problem that social laws are usually qualified ceteris paribus is then considered. How the natural sciences handle ceteris paribus laws is discussed and it is argued that such procedures are possible in the social (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • Physicalism: Ontology, determination and reduction.Geoffrey Paul Hellman & Frank Wilson Thompson - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (October):551-64.
  • Making Sense of Marx.Jon Elster - 1985 - Science and Society 49 (4):497-501.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   125 citations