Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Why It Matters The Implications of Autonomous Processes for Dual Process Theories—Commentary on Evans & Stanovich.Valerie A. Thompson - 2013 - Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3):253-256.
    Evans and Stanovich propose that Type 1 processes should be defined in terms of autonomy, such that they are initiated and run to completion in the presence of relevant triggering conditions. In this commentary, I argue that their autonomous execution has implications for the nature of the representation that is formed and for the shape and outcome of subsequent Type 2 processes. In addition, I argue that Type 2 processes may also be triggered automatically, but that, unlike Type 1 processes, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Analytic thinking: do you feel like it?Valerie Thompson & Kinga Morsanyi - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):93-105.
    A major challenge for Dual Process Theories of reasoning is to predict the circumstances under which intuitive answers reached on the basis of Type 1 processing are kept or discarded in favour of analytic, Type 2 processing (Thompson 2009 ). We propose that a key determinant of the probability that Type 2 processes intervene is the affective response that accompanies Type 1 processing. This affective response arises from the fluency with which the initial answer is produced, such that fluently produced (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • The role of intuition and deliberative thinking in experts’ superior tactical decision-making.Jerad H. Moxley, K. Anders Ericsson, Neil Charness & Ralf T. Krampe - 2012 - Cognition 124 (1):72-78.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Do intuitive and deliberate judgments rely on two distinct neural systems? A case study in face processing.Laura F. Mega, Gerd Gigerenzer & Kirsten G. Volz - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:148721.
    Arguably the most influential models of human decision-making today are based on the assumption that two separable systems – intuition and deliberation – underlie the judgments that people make. Our recent work is among the first to present neural evidence contrary to the predictions of these dual-systems accounts. We measured brain activations using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants were specifically instructed to either intuitively or deliberately judge the authenticity of emotional facial expressions. Results from three different analyses revealed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Effects of processing style on responsiveness to affective stimuli and processing fluency.Koen A. Dijkstra, Joop van der Pligt & Gerben A. van Kleef - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (6):959-970.
  • Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.Jonathan Evans - 2008 - Annu.Rev.Psychol 59:255-278.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   194 citations  
  • The duality of mind: a historical perspective.Keith Frankish & Evans & B. T. Jonathan St - 2009 - In Jonathan Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Parts and wholes in face recognition.J. W. Tanaka & M. J. Farah - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):520-520.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   107 citations