Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Structural Proof Theory.Sara Negri, Jan von Plato & Aarne Ranta - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
    Structural proof theory is a branch of logic that studies the general structure and properties of logical and mathematical proofs. This book is both a concise introduction to the central results and methods of structural proof theory, and a work of research that will be of interest to specialists. The book is designed to be used by students of philosophy, mathematics and computer science. The book contains a wealth of results on proof-theoretical systems, including extensions of such systems from logic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  • A Note on the Godel-Gentzen Translation.Hajime Ishihara - 2000 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (1):135-138.
    We give a variant of the Gödel-Gentzen-negative translation, and a syntactic characterization which entails conservativity result for formulas.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Basic Proof Theory.A. S. Troelstra - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
    This introduction to the basic ideas of structural proof theory contains a thorough discussion and comparison of various types of formalization of first-order logic. Examples are given of several areas of application, namely: the metamathematics of pure first-order logic (intuitionistic as well as classical); the theory of logic programming; category theory; modal logic; linear logic; first-order arithmetic and second-order logic. In each case the aim is to illustrate the methods in relatively simple situations and then apply them elsewhere in much (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   79 citations  
  • Basic Proof Theory.Roy Dyckhoff - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):280-280.
  • Structural Proof Theory.Harold T. Hodes - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (2):255-258.
  • Minimal From Classical Proofs.Helmut Schwichtenberg & Christoph Senjak - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (6):740-748.
    Let A be a formula without implications, and Γ consist of formulas containing disjunction and falsity only negatively and implication only positively. Orevkov and Nadathur proved that classical derivability of A from Γ implies intuitionistic derivability, by a transformation of derivations in sequent calculi. We give a new proof of this result , where the input data are natural deduction proofs in long normal form involving stability axioms for relations; the proof gives a quadratic algorithm to remove the stability axioms. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Proof Analysis: A Contribution to Hilbert's Last Problem.Sara Negri & Jan von Plato - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Prologue: Hilbert's Last Problem; 1. Introduction; Part I. Proof Systems Based on Natural Deduction: 2. Rules of proof: natural deduction; 3. Axiomatic systems; 4. Order and lattice theory; 5. Theories with existence axioms; Part II. Proof Systems Based on Sequent Calculus: 6. Rules of proof: sequent calculus; 7. Linear order; Part III. Proof Systems for Geometric Theories: 8. Geometric theories; 9. Classical and intuitionistic axiomatics; 10. Proof analysis in elementary geometry; Part IV. Proof Systems for Nonclassical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Contraction-Free Sequent Calculi for Geometric Theories with an Application to Barr's Theorem.Sara Negri - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (4):389-401.
    Geometric theories are presented as contraction- and cut-free systems of sequent calculi with mathematical rules following a prescribed rule-scheme that extends the scheme given in Negri and von Plato. Examples include cut-free calculi for Robinson arithmetic and real closed fields. As an immediate consequence of cut elimination, it is shown that if a geometric implication is classically derivable from a geometric theory then it is intuitionistically derivable.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations