Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Toward Understanding Each Other: Bridging Gaps in the Science‐and‐Religion Dialogue.Grace Wolf-Chase - 2004 - Zygon 39 (2):393-395.
    . The high degree of specialization in society and compartmentalization in education have resulted in increasing difficulty in communicating across different fields of study. I propose that these gaps in communication across disciplines must be addressed to ensure a fruitful ongoing science-and-religion dialogue.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Toward an Ethics of Knowledge.Vítor Westhelle - 2004 - Zygon 39 (2):383-388.
    . Modern science is one form of knowledge, demarcated by its time (modernity) and by other “knowledges.” There is a fair amount of clarity as to what does not count as scientific, but there is a twilight zone of knowledges whose scientific status is ambivalent. In this zone the encounter between science and religion takes place. The particular contribution of religion and theology in this encounter is to call for an ethics of knowledge in the epistemological endeavors of science.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Science and Religion in the Twenty‐First Century.Varadaraja V. Raman - 2004 - Zygon 39 (2):397-399.
    . To achieve peace on our planet we must bridge the gap not only between science and religion but also among faith traditions. Accepting the doctrine of multiple paths can reduce interreligious tensions. Every view of the Divine is partial, every faith system rests upon supreme spiritual experiences, and each one provides fulfillment in the yearning to connect with the Cosmic Mystery.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Future Directions for the Zygon Center.Ian G. Barbour - 2004 - Zygon 39 (2):389-391.
    . A brief comparison of the Zygon Center for Religion and Science and the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences is given. The work and emphases of the two Centers overlap but also differ in significant ways. Without neglecting the physical sciences or the Christian tradition, ZCRS would do well to continue to give high priority to the biological sciences and the dialogue with the major world religions.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations