Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Equivalent decision trees and their associated strategy sets.Irving H. Lavalle & Peter C. Fishburn - 1987 - Theory and Decision 23 (1):37-63.
  • An analysis of simple counting methods for ordering incomplete ordinal data.William V. Gehrlein & Peter C. Fishburn - 1977 - Theory and Decision 8 (3):209-227.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Unique nontransitive measurement on finite sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (1):21-46.
  • The axioms and algebra of ambiguity.Peter C. Fishburn - 1993 - Theory and Decision 34 (2):119-137.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Subjective expected utility: A review of normative theories. [REVIEW]Peter C. Fishburn - 1981 - Theory and Decision 13 (2):139-199.
  • Signed orders in linear and nonlinear utility theory.Peter C. Fishburn & Irving H. La Valle - 1996 - Theory and Decision 40 (1):79-101.
  • On Harsanyi's utilitarian cardinal welfare theorem.Peter C. Fishburn - 1984 - Theory and Decision 17 (1):21-28.
  • On the foundations of mean-variance analyses.Peter C. Fishburn - 1979 - Theory and Decision 10 (1-4):99-111.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Majority efficiencies for simple voting procedures: Summary and interpretation. [REVIEW]Peter C. Fishburn & William V. Gehrlein - 1982 - Theory and Decision 14 (2):141-153.
  • Mixture axioms in linear and multilinear utility theories.Peter C. Fishburn & Fred S. Roberts - 1978 - Theory and Decision 9 (2):161-171.
  • Even-chance lotteries in social choice theory.Peter C. Fishburn - 1972 - Theory and Decision 3 (1):18-40.
  • Discount-neutral utility models for denumerable time streams.Peter Fishburn & Ward Edwards - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (2):139-166.
    This paper formulates and axiomatizes utility models for denumerable time streams that make no commitment in regard to discounting future outcomes. The models address decision under certainty and decision under risk. Independence assumptions in both contexts lead to additive or multiplicative utilities over time periods that allow unambiguous comparisons of the relative importance of different periods. The models accommodate all patterns of future valuation. This discount-neutral feature is attained by restricting preference comparisons to outcome streams or probability distributions on outcome (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dimensions of election procedures: Analyses and comparisons.Peter C. Fishburn - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (4):371-397.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Convex stochastic dominance with finite consequence sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (2):119-137.
  • A theory of subjective expected utility with vague preferences.Peter C. Fishburn - 1975 - Theory and Decision 6 (3):287-310.
  • Binary 2 x 2 Games.Peter C. Fishburn - 1990 - Theory and Decision 29 (3):165.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Anonymity Conditions in Social Choice Theory.Donald E. Campbell - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (1):21.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Anonymity conditions in social choice theory.Donald E. Campbell & Peter C. Fishburn - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (1):21-39.
  • Fair division of indivisible items.Steven J. Brams, Paul H. Edelman & Peter C. Fishburn - 2003 - Theory and Decision 55 (2):147-180.
    This paper analyzes criteria of fair division of a set of indivisible items among people whose revealed preferences are limited to rankings of the items and for whom no side payments are allowed. The criteria include refinements of Pareto optimality and envy-freeness as well as dominance-freeness, evenness of shares, and two criteria based on equally-spaced surrogate utilities, referred to as maxsum and equimax. Maxsum maximizes a measure of aggregate utility or welfare, whereas equimax lexicographically maximizes persons' utilities from smallest to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations