Switch to: Citations

References in:

Naturalness and arbitrariness

Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):283 - 301 (1996)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Parts of Classes.David K. Lewis - 1991 - Blackwell.
  • Against Structural Universals.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):25 – 46.
  • Putnam’s Paradox.David K. Lewis - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236.
  • On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Wiley-Blackwell.
    This book is a defense of modal realism; the thesis that our world is but one of a plurality of worlds, and that the individuals that inhabit our world are only a few out of all the inhabitants of all the worlds. Lewis argues that the philosophical utility of modal realism is a good reason for believing that it is true.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   302 citations  
  • New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
  • What Numbers Could Not Be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
  • Sparseness, Immanence, and Naturalness.Theodore Sider - 1995 - Noûs 29 (3):360-377.
    In the past fifteen years or so there has been a lot of attention paid to theories of “sparse” universals, particularly because of the work of D. M. Armstrong. These theories are of particular interest to those of us concerned with the distinction between natural and non-natural properties, since, as David Lewis has observed, it seems possible to analyze naturalness in terms of sparse universals. Moreover, Armstrong claims that we should conceive of universals as being “immanent” as opposed to “transcendent”, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Universals: An Opinionated Introduction.D. M. ARMSTRONG - 1989 - Westview Press.
    In this short text, a distinguished philosopher turns his attention to one of the oldest and most fundamental philosophical problems of all: How it is that we are able to sort and classify different things as being of the same natural class? Professor Armstrong carefully sets out six major theories—ancient, modern, and contemporary—and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of each. Recognizing that there are no final victories or defeats in metaphysics, Armstrong nonetheless defends a traditional account of universals as the (...)
  • Frege and the Philosophy of Mathematics.Michael D. Resnik - 1980 - Cornell University Press.
  • Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.Saul Kripke - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 51 (1):163-171.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   366 citations  
  • Frege and the Philosophy of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Linda Wetzel & Michael D. Resnik - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (1):114.
  • Neither Magic nor Mereology: A Reply to Lewis.Peter Forrest - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):89 – 91.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • That Numbers Could Be Objects.Linda Wetzel - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (3):273--92.
  • In Defence of Structural Universals.D. M. Armstrong - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):85 – 88.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Whither Physical Objects?Willard Quine - 1976 - In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. pp. 497--504.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   41 citations